托福寫作主要考察學生對詞匯、語法的掌握,，以及邏輯和結構構架能力，一篇好的托福寫作范文能夠幫助同學們抓住托福寫作的得分點,，并能給大家提供提供高分詞匯和句式,，廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院小編為您提供托福作文范文及其翻譯，本篇是關于社會地位的托福作文范文,。
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Social status should be awarded on the amount of wealth an individual has rather than on the skills and experience a person has gained. People's views on the criteria for judging one's social status vary from person to person. Some people think that social status should be awarded on the amount of wealth an individual has while others hold that it should be based on the skills and experience a person has gained. As to me, I argue that one's social status should be awarded on his contribution to society. Therefore, I'm more in favor of the second view. The following are the reasons for my personal inclination. First, using the amount of wealth one has as a criterion is not scientific. While it is true that some successful people have accumulated a large fortune through their own hard work and great effort, thus well deserving a high social status, it is also true that some others merely become rich by inheriting fortunes from their parents. There are even cases of people becoming rich through dishonest and illegal dealings. If these people are awarded high social status, then the virtue of hard work would have no place in our society. Second, more often than not, social status simply cannot be judged by the amount of wealth an individual owns or has accumulated. A simple example can well illustrate this point. We all have read about or heard of quite a few people who were reported to have sacrificed their own lives when they were trying to save others from danger: fire, drowning and so on. They might not be rich before they died, yet, can you say that they do not deserve the respect of the whole society? And in line with this way of reasoning, can you say that they do not deserve a high social status? Third, social status should be granted on the contribution one has made to society. In light of this criterion, scientists, doctors, nurses, teachers, the average workers, charity people, and even dustmen, should enjoy a higher social status, and therefore, should be held in high respect by the whole society. The reason is simple-it is through their selfless work and contribution that our life has become better and better. To conclude, social status should not be awarded by simply looking at how much wealth one has amassed in his lifetime. Social status is, in fact, a public recognition and evaluation of one's ability, reputation, and one's dignity as a human being. It is, therefore, more of something spiritual than material. So to speak, it should be judged by certain spiritual standards like one's contribution to the common interest of mankind and should in no way be assessed in terms of money or wealth. 廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院資深老師認為,，托福范文必須琢磨透才能真正起到作用，所以廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院為您提供關于社會地位的托福作文范文的翻譯,，希望給各位學子有所啟發(fā),。 大家對于判斷一個人社會地位的標準的看法因人而異,，一些人認為社會地位應該按照一個人擁有的財富量來判定，然而另外一些人認為社會地位應建立在個人所獲得的技能和經(jīng)驗上,。就我而言,，我認為社會地位的高低應建立在對社會貢獻的大小上面。所以,，我更贊成后者的意見,，下面便是我個人傾向的原因。 首先,，將個人擁有的財富量作為判斷標準是不科學的,。雖然一些成功人士是通過努力工作積聚了大筆財富，因而應該得到高的社會地位,，但也有一些人僅僅靠繼承家產(chǎn)變得富有,，甚至還有一部分人通過不誠實的違法勾當而變得富有。如果這一些人也享有很高的社會地位的話,，那么勤奮工作這一美德在我們的社會中將沒有容身之所,。 其次，社會地位就是不能簡單地通過個人擁有或積聚的財富量來判斷,。一個簡單的例子便能夠很好地說明這一點,。我們都讀過或聽說過不少人被報道在努力從大火、洪水等危險中拯救他人時犧牲了自己的生命,。他們在死前或許并不富有,，但是，你能說他們配不上整個社會的尊敬嗎,？同樣道理,，難道你能說他們不該擁有較高的社會地位嗎？ 第三,，社會地位應根據(jù)個人對社會做出的貢獻來評定,。根據(jù)這一標準，科學家,、醫(yī)生,、護士、老師,、工人,、慈善人士，甚至清潔工,，都應該享有較高的社會地位,。因此，他們應該受到全社會的尊敬,。原因很簡單-就是他們無私的工作和貢獻才使得我們的生活越來越美好,。 總之,，財富量不應作為判斷社會地位的標準。實際上,，社會地位是公眾對一個人的能力,、名聲和作為人的尊嚴的承認和評價。因此,，它更側重精神層面的東西,，而不是物質(zhì)方面的。這樣說來,，它就應該通過比如某個人為人類的共同利益做出的貢獻這樣的某些精神方面的標準來判定,，而不應該按照金錢和財富來斷定。
廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院認為,，托福寫作要想寫好,，無外乎三點，論證,，邏輯及語言,。而考生在考前面臨的問題之一往往就是，無從提筆,，無話可寫,，無題可論。所以讀范文的時候也要從這些方面入手研習,。廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院小編希望本篇關于社會地位的托福作文范文能給大家有所啟發(fā),。
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Social status should be awarded on the amount of wealth an individual has rather than on the skills and experience a person has gained. People's views on the criteria for judging one's social status vary from person to person. Some people think that social status should be awarded on the amount of wealth an individual has while others hold that it should be based on the skills and experience a person has gained. As to me, I argue that one's social status should be awarded on his contribution to society. Therefore, I'm more in favor of the second view. The following are the reasons for my personal inclination. First, using the amount of wealth one has as a criterion is not scientific. While it is true that some successful people have accumulated a large fortune through their own hard work and great effort, thus well deserving a high social status, it is also true that some others merely become rich by inheriting fortunes from their parents. There are even cases of people becoming rich through dishonest and illegal dealings. If these people are awarded high social status, then the virtue of hard work would have no place in our society. Second, more often than not, social status simply cannot be judged by the amount of wealth an individual owns or has accumulated. A simple example can well illustrate this point. We all have read about or heard of quite a few people who were reported to have sacrificed their own lives when they were trying to save others from danger: fire, drowning and so on. They might not be rich before they died, yet, can you say that they do not deserve the respect of the whole society? And in line with this way of reasoning, can you say that they do not deserve a high social status? Third, social status should be granted on the contribution one has made to society. In light of this criterion, scientists, doctors, nurses, teachers, the average workers, charity people, and even dustmen, should enjoy a higher social status, and therefore, should be held in high respect by the whole society. The reason is simple-it is through their selfless work and contribution that our life has become better and better. To conclude, social status should not be awarded by simply looking at how much wealth one has amassed in his lifetime. Social status is, in fact, a public recognition and evaluation of one's ability, reputation, and one's dignity as a human being. It is, therefore, more of something spiritual than material. So to speak, it should be judged by certain spiritual standards like one's contribution to the common interest of mankind and should in no way be assessed in terms of money or wealth. 廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院資深老師認為,，托福范文必須琢磨透才能真正起到作用，所以廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院為您提供關于社會地位的托福作文范文的翻譯,，希望給各位學子有所啟發(fā),。 大家對于判斷一個人社會地位的標準的看法因人而異,，一些人認為社會地位應該按照一個人擁有的財富量來判定，然而另外一些人認為社會地位應建立在個人所獲得的技能和經(jīng)驗上,。就我而言,，我認為社會地位的高低應建立在對社會貢獻的大小上面。所以,，我更贊成后者的意見,，下面便是我個人傾向的原因。 首先,，將個人擁有的財富量作為判斷標準是不科學的,。雖然一些成功人士是通過努力工作積聚了大筆財富，因而應該得到高的社會地位,，但也有一些人僅僅靠繼承家產(chǎn)變得富有,，甚至還有一部分人通過不誠實的違法勾當而變得富有。如果這一些人也享有很高的社會地位的話,，那么勤奮工作這一美德在我們的社會中將沒有容身之所,。 其次，社會地位就是不能簡單地通過個人擁有或積聚的財富量來判斷,。一個簡單的例子便能夠很好地說明這一點,。我們都讀過或聽說過不少人被報道在努力從大火、洪水等危險中拯救他人時犧牲了自己的生命,。他們在死前或許并不富有,，但是，你能說他們配不上整個社會的尊敬嗎,？同樣道理,，難道你能說他們不該擁有較高的社會地位嗎？ 第三,，社會地位應根據(jù)個人對社會做出的貢獻來評定,。根據(jù)這一標準，科學家,、醫(yī)生,、護士、老師,、工人,、慈善人士，甚至清潔工,，都應該享有較高的社會地位,。因此，他們應該受到全社會的尊敬,。原因很簡單-就是他們無私的工作和貢獻才使得我們的生活越來越美好,。 總之,，財富量不應作為判斷社會地位的標準。實際上,，社會地位是公眾對一個人的能力,、名聲和作為人的尊嚴的承認和評價。因此,，它更側重精神層面的東西,，而不是物質(zhì)方面的。這樣說來,，它就應該通過比如某個人為人類的共同利益做出的貢獻這樣的某些精神方面的標準來判定,，而不應該按照金錢和財富來斷定。
廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院認為,，托福寫作要想寫好,，無外乎三點，論證,，邏輯及語言,。而考生在考前面臨的問題之一往往就是，無從提筆,，無話可寫,，無題可論。所以讀范文的時候也要從這些方面入手研習,。廣州環(huán)球雅思北美學院小編希望本篇關于社會地位的托福作文范文能給大家有所啟發(fā),。